Tags
Family photographs, Halina Piwko Bereda, Hinda Walfisz Piwko, mother-daughter relationships, women
My friend Justyna, a regular reader of the blog, remarked recently, “I don’t hear/see that much about men in your mom’s family.” And she’s right. Most of the relatives I knew growing up were female—Mama, Babcia, Auntie Nunia, Aunt Teresa. Most of the family stories featured them and a few other female relatives—Auntie Lusia, Mama’s cousins big Pauline and little Pauline. A simple explanation might be longevity; the men died young and the women lived much longer. Babcia lived to 99, Auntie Nunia to 97. But there’s more to it than that. I come from a long line of strong women. Each one made an impression on those around her, though each did so in her own way.
I get the sense that another thing that was passed down was close, but contentious relationships between mothers and daughters. Perhaps it’s inevitable when strong personalities collide.
I don’t know a lot about my grandmother’s relationship with her mother. All my mom has told me about her grandmother is that she was physically small but she took charge in her large family. She had a dozen children over 24 years, starting with a daughter when she was just 19 and ending with twins at age 43. After the twins (one of whom died as an infant, the other as a teenager), my grandmother was the youngest. Looking at them together in the photo that launched my search for my Jewish heritage, I imagine they probably loved each other but drove each other crazy. More likely than not, my great grandmother was a very religious Jew. My grandmother was fun loving and bold, and eventually rejected her religion and her family for a life in Warsaw society.
I dissect the specific features captured in the photo, scouring them for hints about the people photographed. Babcia’s dress is silken, with what looks like a fabric train in back, a light colored inset at the bodice, and a rose-like adornment at her waistline. Even more striking is the dress’s length, reaching only to mid-calf and revealing a stockinged leg and high heels. Her mother, by contrast, wears a long dark dress made of matte fabric except for a silky dark addition at the wrists and shoulders. My grandmother looks coquettishly into the camera; though she does not smile, you can almost see her dimples. Her mother’s expression is serous. The thing that hints most directly at their relationship is the way my grandmother grips her mother’s hand. But what does this gesture say? Is it a sign of affection? Might it be an indication of special intimacy? Or perhaps is my grandmother expressing her possessiveness? Or her power over her mother? My great grandmother rests her hands on her knees straight in front her. My grandmother’s knees are turned toward her mother, her body at an angle to the camera.
I talked about this photo at a conference recently, and remarked how my grandmother is more brightly lit than anyone else in the photo. She’s positioned in the foreground as if she is preparing to leap out of the frame. When I described the way my grandmother clasps her mother’s wrist, and asked what it might communicate about their relationship, someone suggested it might not be a gesture of affection or power so much as reassurance. As if my grandmother knew she would leave her mother soon, and wanted to reassure her everything would be alright.
My Mama and Babcia were in many ways opposites, also. Mama was shy to the point of fearful of social situations; Babcia thrived as the center of attention. And yet, both could command any room they entered. Partly, this is a product of upbringing. They knew how to dress elegantly and carried themselves with an air of refinement that stood out in casual American settings. While Babcia entertained and commanded, Mama was more likely to draw people out and empathize with them.
Their relationship was complicated. On one hand, they depended on each other throughout their lives. Babcia helped Mama when she was injured and had to find a way out of Poland. Mama helped Babcia when she grew older, managing her finances and taking the train into the city from Long Island to visit every week. On the other hand, I get the impression Mama resented being “abandoned” by her mother at two critical junctures in her life. The first time was when she was left with an aunt as a very young child when Babcia ran away from her first husband and remarried. The second time was when Mama became a mother (eventually of four children) but Babcia decided to move to Puerto Rico. Further, Mama was deeply hurt and resentful when toward the end of her life, Babcia treated her poorly and failed to appreciate everything Mama did for her. Intellectually, she knew Babcia’s ill temper was a product of age and illness, but that didn’t ease the sting of feeling her efforts unrecognized. I think my mother was inordinately sensitive to her mother’s criticism, and perhaps annoyed with herself that it mattered so much. But maybe (probably) I’m projecting because that’s how I feel about my relationship with my mother.

The Galbraiths with Babcia outside Babcia’s apartment on Riverside Drive sometime in the early 1980s.
There are very few pictures of my mother together with my grandmother. Mama was reluctant to have her photo taken any time with anyone. This one, taken outside of Babcia’s apartment sometime around the early 1980s, is interesting for two reasons. First, it shows the distinctive style of both women. Second, there’s a hand on Babcia’s shoulder, probably my brother Chris’s [oops. Krysia’s right. It’s Wiley’s hand 10-29-15]. This gesture appears in many family photographs.
It’s hard for me to say if I am very similar to my mother or very different. It’s probably both, though neither made it easy for us to get along. I have no doubt that I became a professor, in part, to realize her dream for me—a dream she gave up for herself in order to have a “normal life” as a wife and mother. Perhaps it’s typical of my generation that I was raised believing I can have it all (and I more or less do, but there’s a price to pay for that, too). It’s hard to find the words to describe our relationship. What comes out is either a string of platitudes or far too much detail. Suffice it to say we were very close. So close, I was angry with her most of the time between the ages of 13 and 33, probably as a way of separating and asserting my autonomy. Mama was simultaneously weak and strong, shy and bold, afraid of meeting people and quick to establish intimacy with them. It drove me crazy that all my friends loved her and confided in her when I felt like I couldn’t talk to her myself. I’m just grateful that I finally stopped being mad. And now that I can’t talk with her anymore, I miss her. She was the person I was most likely to turn to in a crisis, like the time I was in labor, Ian was breech, and I and couldn’t think clearly enough to decide whether to continue with a natural childbirth or have a Cesarean section. She knew what to say to reassure me, to help me make the right decision.
This photo is from Mama’s 90th birthday party in June 2012. Mama had often talked about wanting to have a white party in her garden. So my brothers and I made it happen. Dozens of relatives, friends, and even former neighbors came to celebrate, and everyone really did dress in white. In this photo, I notice again our hands. My brothers and I form a protective ring around Mama, our hands on her arm or shoulder, and Chris with his other hand on Wiley’s shoulder. We do so casually, an unorchestrated mark of intimacy and affection. And an appropriate complement to the photo of my grandmother with her hand placed upon her mother’s wrist.
Hi Marysia
Hope u r all Ok
Just finish red ur last post and look into the picture of the family and grandmother of u and it remind me Rachel Kolski âher sister
The way they stand the way they made the hair
Then I red again the post u wrote about them and it look like there was some “fight” between the two strong women and no one give up
Nice of u of writing all of this and hope the young generation one day will have time or willing to go and read it-today everyone is busy with kids and jobs and running after the tails
Send my regards to IAN
Shabbat Shalom
Pini
I will show it to Pnina when she will come back from London
P/S I add one picture of Rachel Children in Israel and wife (early 50-60 in Tel Aviv in Nachmany 28 (the building that Pichas Kolski build in 1930 for his children and as a Big Zionist and clever man that invest in Israel-that time Palestrina- for bad days) unfortunately he couldnât do it but all of his children and Rachel Kolski live there long time-the building is still there but not belong any more to the Kolski family(m father was the only one that didnât live there he Join the British Army 1939-1945 and when he come from the war he went to Kfar Ata (where Pichas Kolski had 5 Acre of land as well) and he built his house there(where I born)
LikeLike
Here’s some comments from my cousin Joan (and my response to her). Her grandmother Liba was the oldest sister of my grandmother Halina and of Pini’s grandmother Rachel. One of the main things Joan would like to understand is why her father never talked about my branch of the family. They were very involved in the Piwko-Winawer family circle and had close relations with other relatives.
Joan: As always I read your last blog with great interest. Little Pauline and Big Pauline? I remember my father talking about little and big. Cannot remember which or who he was referring to. There was Pauline Winawer Kanal and Pauline Rosen. There was also a little lady who came to all the meetings (Pifko –Winawer family circle.) A small lady who always wore a hat with a veil and smoked a lot. (Memories that keep coming back.) I am not sure, but I think her name was also Pauline.
As to your religious great grandmother – I do remember my father talking about how his father was always studying and was a religious man. He also indicated that his grandparents were religious. I always got the impression it was a FIDDLER ON THE ROOF story. Everyone who was Jewish was religious. Community? Much has been written about communities that are centered around a religious group. You talk about the fact that the women in your family were strong personalities. That is how my father viewed his mother. He had a great respect for her and for her intelligence and so he always felt that women were important.
Mothers, daughters, fathers, sons. Books have been written about family relationships. Because of your blogs I have spent time thinking about the Winawers and how that was so much part of my growing up.
Thank you. One day I should (not sure it will ever happen) write about my relationship with my Mother and with my Father. I know my children are aware of that relationship, because I do talk about it a lot.
Marysia: As always, I appreciate your comments. That’s interesting that you remember the labels “big” and “little” Pauline, too. I remember that Pauline Kanal was one of them (maybe “little” even though she was physically bigger than “big” Pauline). I’ve wondered who the other Pauline was. I think my mom told me the labels referred to age differences–big Pauline was older, and Mama described her as very sweet. That would fit with her being Pauline Rosen, who was about 10 years older than Pauline Kanal. I don’t remember a 3rd Pauline in the US, though there is one who grew up in Zurich and then married a nephew of our grandmothers (their sister Rachel’s son Abraham). I have found a document that suggests they might have come to the US at some point before WW II, but I don’t know for sure.
I wonder. Who was the small lady in the hat? What a fascinating image.
Pini says his mother was a strong woman, too. You might be interested to read his comment on the blog. May I post yours, too?
I would love to have met all the sisters! And our great-grandparents, too, though I’m not sure what they would have thought of me…
Joan: I want to again thank you for all those interesting blogs. I do read them (as you are aware)and do remember all those interesting family gatherings. There is no longer anyone I can share those memories with so your blogs have been wonderful for me. I am flattered that you want to include what I said in your blog. Yes, you may. I would like to read what Pini remembers about the Pifko’ women. (I used to think of them as the Winawers, but because of your information I realize that it was really Pifkos.) When my Mother was really annoyed at me, she would say something like you are a Pifko. I never thought too much about it until recently. I am now beginning to think it was a compliment although when she said it, it didn’t sound like one. I do know that she did not like her mother-in-law. I am sorry that she never shared with me more about the family dynamics. My father talked about his youth, when he came here, his business, but nothing about what was happening within the family once he was here even though we spent a great deal of time with his family.
If what my father told me was correct, both his parents and grandparents (your great grandparents) would have been very proud of you. (Again my impression) They respected and admired strong, intelligent women. It was important to my father that I as well as my brother go to college. He believed that women should use their intelligence. I think they may have been ahead of their times in believing that women were as smart as men. Just look at what some of that generation did. Goldie (Philip’s wife) helped him build a large business with many really good investments. It might be interesting if someone like John Lewis would share some of his thoughts about his Mother and Aunts. They were also strong personalities. Although religion seemed to be important I always got the feeling it was because of where they lived and the times. My father worked on Saturday, ate non-kosher food, and never seemed to have a problem with it. I am sorry that your Mother and Aunt were not more visible to me in the family circle. From your blogs I feel that I missed meeting out.
LikeLike
A rich reflection on so many levels! I think our Babcia’s hand on her mother’s wrist is both reassurance and connectedness with the past, even though in many ways it would reject her when she stepped outside the norm and divorced, marrying outside the religion of her family. I also think it’s almost pressing down on all that pressed down on her–yes, an act of quiet assertiveness. I also notice the dynamic of the family photo with Babcia outside her apartment. Your Mom is disengaged, somewhat yet standing firm. You are leaning in towards your grandmother–again, drawn to the past, and Babcia decisively, still impetuous after all the years, turns away from family itself–towards her own destiny. By the way–I’m going with Wylan’s hand on Babcia’s shoulder. His right sleeve matches his left. A general protectiveness and care towards her emerges–and we know where he got that from. The complex dance of love and independence that is so much of our heritage, too.
LikeLike
It’s great to hear my cousins’ responses to this post, and especially from you who knew Babcia and my Mama. And yes, these photos tell us so much.
LikeLike